<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jazz-Sax.Com &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jazz-sax.com/tag/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com</link>
	<description>Jazz-Sax, all things Jazz and Sax</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:05:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jason Robert Brown vs. SheetMusic Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2010/07/jason-robert-brown-vs-sheetmusic-trader/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=jason-robert-brown-vs-sheetmusic-trader</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2010/07/jason-robert-brown-vs-sheetmusic-trader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 05:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Robert brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jazz-sax.com/2010/07/04/jason-robert-brown-vs-sheetmusic-trader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Adam Savage of Mythbusters tweeted this blog entry of a exchange between composer/artist Jason Robert Brown and someone who was trading his music. Very interesting discussion]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2010/07/jason-robert-brown-vs-sheetmusic-trader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record Companies Finally Win One</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/10/record-companies-finally-win-one/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=record-companies-finally-win-one</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/10/record-companies-finally-win-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 07:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p2p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jazz-sax.com/?p=882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet After all the lawsuits they have started, they finally won one. In a major win for record companies seeking to establish precedent for prosecuting those who trade copyrighted material on the Internet, a federal jury awarded six firms $222,000 in damages from a Minnesota woman who shared music online. Jammie Thomas, 30, was ordered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/10/record-companies-finally-win-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sordid Tale Of Guardala</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/09/the-sordid-tale-of-guardala/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-sordid-tale-of-guardala</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/09/the-sordid-tale-of-guardala/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail from grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scammer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jazz-sax.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet It is sad that one of the great makers of mouthpieces and horns has messed up everything. From a Newsday Article: &#8220;David Guardala is sort of the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde of the saxophone world, according to federal prosecutors and some of those he is accused of swindling. As of yesterday, Guardala was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2007/09/the-sordid-tale-of-guardala/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best/Worst Of 2005</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2005/12/bestworst-of-2005/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bestworst-of-2005</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2005/12/bestworst-of-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet I just picked up a copy of Tim Ries &#8220;The Rolling Stones Project&#8221;. I have to say, this is probably the best CD I&#8217;ve bought in 2005. I can&#8217;t think of another CD that I bought in 2005 that was better. Seriously, I think the industry needs to stop doing American Idol and other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2005/12/bestworst-of-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orson Scott Card on Copyrights</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/09/orson-scott-card-on-copyrights/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=orson-scott-card-on-copyrights</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/09/orson-scott-card-on-copyrights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Author Orson Scott Card has a great article/column on his take of copyrights. Excellent views! Some musicians are getting verbal about the RIAA suing people. This article seems to suggest that there is finally some realization that the record industry is screwing the artists. There is even mention of iTunes Store. I still think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/09/orson-scott-card-on-copyrights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exposing the Happy Birthday story</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/06/exposing-the-happy-birthday-story/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exposing-the-happy-birthday-story</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/06/exposing-the-happy-birthday-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet J. Byron writes &#8220; Exposing the Happy Birthday story: An editorial by J. Byron, May 2003, rev. June 2003 In this article, I attempt to answer three questions: 1 - What is that song Good Morning to All, and how does it relate to Happy Birthday to You? 2 - Is the melody to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/06/exposing-the-happy-birthday-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The Real James Bond Please Stand Up</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/05/will-the-real-james-bond-please-stand-up/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-the-real-james-bond-please-stand-up</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/05/will-the-real-james-bond-please-stand-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2003 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Composer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Bond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet For a long time, it was thought that John Berry wrote the famous &#8220;James Bond Theme&#8221;. However, it&#8217;s not true. Here is an interesting look into what happened, and how it got corrected.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2003/05/will-the-real-james-bond-please-stand-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satin Doll Copyright Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/10/satin-doll-copyright-suit/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=satin-doll-copyright-suit</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/10/satin-doll-copyright-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ellington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strayhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Did Ellington and Strayhorn get along? Well, the heirs of their estates are certainly are NOT. Seems that the rights to &#8220;Satin Doll&#8221; are at stake. "Third-party plaintiffs, Famous Music Corporation and Mercer Ellington (collectively "the Ellington Estate"), filed a third-party complaint against third-party defendant, Gregory A. Morris, executor of the Billy Strayhorn estate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/10/satin-doll-copyright-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cage Tries to Copyright Silence</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/06/cage-tries-to-copyright-silence/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cage-tries-to-copyright-silence</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/06/cage-tries-to-copyright-silence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john cage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whaaaat?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Sometimes, reality is too funny. Here is an article saying that John Cage&#8216;s representatives are trying to copyright silence. Oh my gosh. What is next, the John Coltrane foundation going after players for using Coltrane&#8217;s licks? What is the deal? In another related story, the Music Industry has been convicted of price fixing. Naw. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/06/cage-tries-to-copyright-silence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music/Law/Copyright&#8230;.The whole Shebang</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/04/musiclawcopyrightthe-whole-shebang/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=musiclawcopyrightthe-whole-shebang</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/04/musiclawcopyrightthe-whole-shebang/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whaaaat?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet This website comprises hundreds of documents (texts, scores, audio and video files) associated with music copyright infringement cases in the United States from 1845 forward. All of these documents have been collected, edited, digitized, organized, analyzed, and commented upon by staff at Columbia Law Library and the Columbia Center for New Media Teaching and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/04/musiclawcopyrightthe-whole-shebang/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Radio and Retroactive Royalties</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/internet-radio-and-retroactive-royalties/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=internet-radio-and-retroactive-royalties</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/internet-radio-and-retroactive-royalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2002 00:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Will this be the death blow to internet radio? The American Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (&#8220;CARP&#8221;) is proposing to lawmakers that internet radio stations pay royalties retroactive to 1998; royalties of .14&#162; per song per listener for Internet-only webcasters, .07&#162; per song per listener for broadcast radio simulcasts, and .02&#162; per song per listener [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/internet-radio-and-retroactive-royalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Connick Jr. and His New Patent</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/harry-connick-jr-and-his-new-patent/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=harry-connick-jr-and-his-new-patent</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/harry-connick-jr-and-his-new-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry connick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheet Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whaaaat?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet According to this New York Times article(registration required), Harry Connick Jr. is a proud owner of Patent 6,348,648. A system and method for coordinated music composition and display among musicians is presented. The system and method enables a conductor, composer or band leader to interactively edit one or more score parts of a composition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/03/harry-connick-jr-and-his-new-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death Of Streaming Music?</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/02/death-of-streaming-music/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=death-of-streaming-music</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/02/death-of-streaming-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whaaaat?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whaat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[www]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet This article tells of a settlement in royalty rates. "The Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel said AM and FM radio stations should pay 0.07 cent per song, with Internet-only Webcasters paying 0.14 cent per song. The rates, retroactive to 1998, also charge a 9 percent "ephemeral license fee." Why the higher rate for internet music? [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/02/death-of-streaming-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Liebman Newsletter And Taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/david-liebman-newsletter-and-taxes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=david-liebman-newsletter-and-taxes</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/david-liebman-newsletter-and-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2002 12:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david liebman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whaaaat?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet If you don&#8217;t get David Liebman&#8217;s newsletter, go and subscribe to it. David Liebman is very interesting, and I enjoy his thoughts and prospectives on whatever he writes about. In the last issue I received today, he had an interesting section. Here it is: THE IRS and PRACTICE ROOM DEDUCTION: From a newsletter I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/david-liebman-newsletter-and-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CD Copy Protection and Support</title>
		<link>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/cd-copy-protection-and-support/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=cd-copy-protection-and-support</link>
		<comments>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/cd-copy-protection-and-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2002 09:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copy protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Copy protected CDs. Yes, they are coming thanks to the Universal Music Group. To prepare for the backlash they are likely to receive, they have a support site up complete with FAQ section and how to get a refund if the CD doesn&#8217;t work. I doubt they will be doing this to any jazz [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jazz-sax.com/2002/01/cd-copy-protection-and-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

