You are browsing the archive for Web.

Saxophone Mouthpieces Rated

May 26, 2002 in Articles

I came across this website of a Japanese fellow who has an interesting idea. A website where he has rated mouthpieces and even has clips of what he sounds like. The pages are in Japanese. You can use Babelfish to translate the pages.Interesting idea!

Music Theory Site

April 27, 2002 in Articles

While cruising the internet, I came across Musictheory.net. Very Nice site! Covers a lot of stuff from basic “Here is the staff and clef” to building chords. It even has trainers on it, where you can do ear training, chords, just about everything. Great!

And, to top it off, it was done by a PERCUSSIONIST. I think hell has finally frozen over (a joke…..). Seriously though, a very well done site. Awesome job!Which brings up a good question. Anyone found any sites like this one?

www.alibris.com

April 9, 2002 in Articles

BIABfsg writes “I would like to share some information regarding this website. Alibris.com.


You can find a lots of second-handed books at very low price. I can recall that when I was studying J. Coltrane and I realized that there was a need to study some literatures regarding J. Coltrane, thus I spent some time to do my shopping at Amazon.com to get books such as “Ascension, John Coltrane and his quest” “John Coltrane by Bill Cole” “Coltrane, Chasin’ the Trane by J.C. Thomas” “John Coltrane, his life and music by Lewis Porter”…etc (more than 10 books…) though Amanzon.com provides 30% off of original price, still….but I got those books anyway…


Now, with alibris.com I could get “Coltrane, Cahsin’ the Trane by J.C. Thomas” for 4.95…..This is also a great website to get those reference books such as New Grove Dictionary of Jazz, Oxford Companian For Jazz,..etc at very low price.


If you got stuff over $50, alibris.com will provide free shipping.


Discount Code (SPRING) will take $5 off of $20 order or up.”

Interesting. There are lots of places to get used stuff. Half.com,Used CDs, Mckay’s Books, the afore mentioned Amazon. You can find lots more by searching for used books and used CDs.

Internet Radio and Retroactive Royalties

March 17, 2002 in Articles

Will this be the death blow to internet radio? The American Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (“CARP”) is proposing to lawmakers that internet radio stations pay royalties retroactive to 1998; royalties of .14¢ per song per listener for Internet-only webcasters, .07¢ per song per listener for broadcast radio simulcasts, and .02¢ per song per listener for non-commercial radio simulcasts.

Most stations are operating on zero financing. Do the math; .02¢ x 12 songs per hour and 100 listeners.

To fight this a website Saveinternetradio.org has been set up for people to support internet radio stations.

San Francisco Symphony For Kids

March 15, 2002 in Articles

KCBS had a little story on a San Francisco Symphony Website for Kids. It is a very well done site that uses Flash in a tasteful way. It is fun, and informational. Highly recommended for kids!

JazzFM and Internet Radio Stations

March 8, 2002 in Articles

The Most Listened To Internet Radio Station In The World is London-based Jazz FM. It’s not really a Jazz station, but it plays delightful lounge music and the sound quality is exceptional. And it makes a profit!

Some other good stations are Ejazz.fm, VirginRadio, BBC Radio, and an interesting station 6music. Of course, the Bay Area favorite for Jazz is KCSM Enjoy!

Death Of Streaming Music?

February 22, 2002 in Articles

This article tells of a settlement in royalty rates.

"The Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel said AM and FM radio stations should pay 0.07 cent per song, with Internet-only Webcasters paying 0.14 cent per song. The rates, retroactive to 1998, also charge a 9 percent "ephemeral license fee."

Why the higher rate for internet music? I don’t understand the thinking.

Bossa Novas

February 15, 2002 in Articles

Found some great Bossa Nova/Brazilian Music links.

The Boss of the Bossa Nova. A very thorough tribute site to Antonio Carlos Jobim, with scores of scores, english lyrics, and rare recordings.

The music’s greatest interpreter is the enigmatic genius Joao Gilberto.

Also check out Slipcue, AllBrazilianMusic, and The Brazilian Sound.

Drop The Needle Test

June 17, 2001 in Articles

I found this link which was kind of interesting. Perhaps we should consider a “name that tune” section on Jazz-Sax. Perhaps maybe if there is enough interest………

Online Saxophone Courses

June 15, 2001 in Articles

Ok, I usually get about 1 or 2 emails a month asking if I do this. And frankly, the answer is no. The Internet is a great place. You can get a degree in a number of disciplines from online universities. However, for saxophone lessons I don’t think the Internet is a good medium for this.Number one reason is that you need to see and hear what is going on to fix a problem. IE: if the ligature is not on right, or the reed is not set right, then it could cause you hours of pain. How can I, as a teacher, address that problem over the Internet? I cannot.

Can’t see embouchure or what it is doing while your playing. Enuf said. No, seriously, if your biting down like some 1800′s patient awaiting a doctor to remove a leg, how am I to guess that. That is definitely something as a teacher that could be addressed ASAP.

Tone. While giving lessons, I deal with tone a lot. Notes and fingers are things that come with practice. Tone though, is something you really have to “hear”. My students are expected to play with good, full tone. If not, they get a “Doh!” and have to start again. Tone is something that is also dealt with easily if someone is actually there.

Now, I’ve been covering the basics. That actual tone generation, etc. Now, what about making someone who can play a little and giving them more reinforcement via online lessons.

Good question. I still maintain that “one on one” private lessons are the best way to do that. There is really nothing like taking a lesson with someone who is excellent on the instrument. Private lessons also are flexible. You can go off in tangents, perhaps during a solo you played an altissimo note. Your teacher can then maybe explore some other altissimo notes. Or maybe you had a very interesting motive that you used a couple of times, although randomly, during your solo. Your teacher could explore that with you as well, hopefully leading you to greater understanding.

This kind of teaching is something I do not see Internet lessons achieving. I don’t think they can. I’d love to see someone prove me wrong.

I do think that Internet lessons could reinforce intellectual understanding of topics. Improv theory. Harmony theory. Perhaps provide you insight to get your fingers more flexible. Increase your rhythmic vocabulary. Etc. But still, without some feedback from somebody, you might not achieve what your setting out to achieve.

I guess what I’m getting at is that yeah, you can learn some stuff off the internet. New patterns, etc, etc. But to really improve on your horn, I think hooking up with a teacher is faster/better/easier.

Online Sheet Music

June 14, 2001 in Articles

I found
this article about the trend of distributing sheet music. I have tried a couple of these, and the ease of the process was refreshing. Infact, they usually let you preview the first page of the sheet music before you buy it.

Now, how come they can’t come up with something like this for audio music?

Microsoft launches streaming music service

April 4, 2001 in Articles

Microsoft, which seemingly wants to enter every market now, has announced its own streaming music service. This is on the heels of Real Networks announcing a licensing agreement with AOL Time Warner Inc., Bertelsmann AG, and EMI Group.

Now, does that mean that artists might release under the “Microsoft Music” label now? And I’ve hear a couple of rumors about Yahoo.Com and Amazon.Com planning on entering the streaming audio arena. But I think Real Networks has already beaten Microsoft to the punch in this realm.

My big problem with Microsoft and audio is that Microsoft seems to think everyone in the world runs Windows. Now, I hate to burst their bubble, but some people run Macintosh, some run Linux, and other operating systems. Microsoft software seems always to be running a version behind for other operating systems. Don’t get me wrong. Microsoft makes good stuff. I use Windows 2000 and 98. But other people choose NOT to use Microsoft stuff, and if say, one finds running Linux is really what suits them, then how are they going to be able to listen to streaming music if you need Windows Media player and it only works on Windows? Real Networks software works on a wide range of platforms, including Linux, FreeBSD, and Macintosh.

I wish Real Networks success in their endeavor!